Each vehicle is rated as to how well it protects its driver in a crash. Also rated is the risk each vehicle presents to other drivers involved in a crash with that particular model.
The vehicle ratings published here were developed by the Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC) whose rating methods have received international recognition. This release is the latest update of the Used Car Safety Ratings 2008
(107KB/1 page) in a series released periodically since 1992.
However not all airbags, for example, are the same. This is why crash records have been used to determine how well individual vehicle models have protected their drivers.
|
The vehicles are rated for Crashworthiness according to how much better or worse they are than the average vehicle. | |
|---|---|
| At least 20% less likely to suffer a serious injury or death | |
| Significantly less likely to suffer a serious injury or death | |
| Average risk of serious injury or death | |
| Significantly more likely to suffer a serious injury or death | |
| At least 20% more likely to suffer a serious injury or death | |
The ANCAP rating method differs to the UCSR ratings method. ANCAP ratings are based on laboratory crash tests that predict the relative occupant protection level of each tested vehicle, in a serious crash.
The UCSR ratings are based on records of over one million on-road crashes that have occurred over a number of years.
Studies conducted by MUARC have found that ANCAP crash test results are a good predictor of new vehicles' on-road crash performance.
The range of occupant protection offered by different vehicle models is wide. On average, a modern vehicle will provide better protection in a crash than an older one. But not all modern vehicles are the same. Safety features such as airbags, advanced seat belt design and vehicle bodies designed to minimise the forces on their occupants are critical.
It is recommended buyers choose a vehicle with a Crashworthiness Rating of Dark Green or Green and at a minimum, Yellow.